> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]
> Actually, I don't find that to be a given. Exactly what use-cases have
> you got that aren't solved as well or better by calling a SECURITY DEFINER
> function owned by the target role?
Oh, that's easy: If you want to do the equivalent of setreuid(geteuid(), getuid()); that is, if you want to drop
privilegesfor a particular operation. Our particular use case is that we want to evaluate an expression provided by the
callerbut with the caller's privileges.
Cheers,
--Ian
