Re: uintptr_t for Datum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Date
Msg-id 13871.1262282929@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: uintptr_t for Datum  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: uintptr_t for Datum  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
>> pg_config.h.in.  Don't do that.  Run autoheader.

> I wasn't aware autoheader existed.  Is that new or has it alwasy been
> part of autoconf?

It's always been there, or at least for many years.  pg_config.h.in
really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
it, you just generate it.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Next
From: "Turner, Ian"
Date:
Subject: Re: Re-enabling SET ROLE in security definer functions