Re: uintptr_t for Datum - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: uintptr_t for Datum
Date
Msg-id 200912311844.nBVIiWn18036@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: uintptr_t for Datum  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: uintptr_t for Datum  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
> >> pg_config.h.in.  Don't do that.  Run autoheader.
> 
> > I wasn't aware autoheader existed.  Is that new or has it alwasy been
> > part of autoconf?
> 
> It's always been there, or at least for many years.  pg_config.h.in
> really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
> it, you just generate it.

Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like
configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking
Next
From: Dimitri Fontaine
Date:
Subject: Re: Thoughts on statistics for continuously advancing columns