On tor, 2009-12-31 at 13:44 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > > Tom Lane wrote:
> > >> BTW, it looks like the patch is showing a manual change to
> > >> pg_config.h.in. Don't do that. Run autoheader.
> >
> > > I wasn't aware autoheader existed. Is that new or has it alwasy been
> > > part of autoconf?
> >
> > It's always been there, or at least for many years. pg_config.h.in
> > really ought to be thought of the same as configure: you don't edit
> > it, you just generate it.
>
> Well, that's pretty confusing considering it has a .in suffix, just like
> configure.in, which we do edit, but I get your point.
I realize it's easy to miss, but the first line of pg_config.h.in tells
that it is generated.
