On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 18:59, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>> On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 18:47, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>>> I think MSVC is just complaining about something gcc doesn't. If you
>>> can disable this specific warning it'd be a good plan.
>
>> Yeah, that should be doable. According to
>> http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/6kck0s93(VS.80).aspx this
>> warning is only about size_t, and not about the issue in general, so I
>> can just disable C4267 and they should go away.
>
> Sounds good. The case we do need to look for is any remaining casts
> between pointer and long. If that's a different warning number then
> we'll be in good shape.
I don't see any such warnings at all. I do see this however:
.\src\backend\utils\mmgr\aset.c(701): warning C4334: '<<' : result
of 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift
intended?) .\src\backend\utils\mmgr\aset.c(705): warning C4334: '<<' : result
of 32-bit shift implicitly converted to 64 bits (was 64-bit shift
intended?)
Perhaps we need some casting there?
Other than that, I see a few more API related warnings that are not
related directly to 32/64-bit. I'l be working on those.
-- Magnus HaganderMe: http://www.hagander.net/Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
