Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jim Nasby
Subject Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not
Date
Msg-id 5D0069EE-32D3-45A1-87B4-267CA86B1D17@pervasive.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not  (Phil Frost <indigo@bitglue.com>)
Responses Re: lastval exposes information that currval does not
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 6, 2006, at 11:02 AM, Phil Frost wrote:
> I hope the above example is strong enough to elicit a comment from a
> qualified developer. If it is not, consider that stored procedures
> contain prepared statements, and many client applications cache  
> prepared
> statements as well. Thus, revoking usage on a schema is about as  
> good as
> nothing until all sessions have ended. It also means that any function
> which operates with OIDs can potentially bypass the schema usage  
> check.

I'm pretty sure that's by design, especially given this tidbit of the  
docs:

"Essentially this allows the grantee to "look up" objects within the  
schema."

Though perhaps the intention is to change this once we have a means  
to invalidate plans.

The docs probably should elaborate that once something's been looked  
up you no longer need permissions on the schema it resides in.
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant      jnasby@pervasive.com
Pervasive Software      http://pervasive.com    work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf       cell: 512-569-9461




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: request for feature: psql 'DSN' option
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] UUID's as primary keys