Re: House style for DocBook documentation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Chapman Flack
Subject Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Date
Msg-id 5C81E9B7.1050909@anastigmatix.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: House style for DocBook documentation?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/15/19 11:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>>>
>>> o  Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>>>
>>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
>>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
>>> hesitation?
> 
> Committed that change.

I only now noticed that probably this should also have been changed:

-o  If you want to supply text, use <link>, else <xref>
+o  If you want to supply text, use <link> or <ulink>, else <xref>

Regards,
-Chap


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL vs SQL/XML Standards
Next
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Making all nbtree entries unique by having heap TIDs participatein comparisons