Re: House style for DocBook documentation? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: House style for DocBook documentation?
Date
Msg-id 8c02f9b5-965e-ce51-2b20-e70c0d46a6a0@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: House style for DocBook documentation?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: House style for DocBook documentation?  (Ramanarayana <raam.soft@gmail.com>)
Re: House style for DocBook documentation?  (Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2019-01-26 09:31, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 25/01/2019 15:37, Chapman Flack wrote:
>>> External links already create footnotes in the PDF output.  Is that
>>> different from what you are saying?
>> That might, only, indicate that I was just thinking aloud in email and
>> had not gone and checked in PDF output to see how the links were handled.
>>
>> Yes, it could very possibly indicate that.
>>
>> If they are already processed that way, does that mean the
>>
>> o  Do not use text with <ulink> so the URL appears in printed output
>>
>> in README.links should be considered obsolete, and removed even, and
>> doc authors should feel free to put link text in <ulink> without
>> hesitation?
> 
> I think it's obsolete, yes.

Committed that change.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut              http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: explain plans with information about (modified) gucs
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Using POPCNT and other advanced bit manipulation instructions