Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Etsuro Fujita
Subject Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
Date
Msg-id 5B3DFDDE.2020803@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw withpartition wise join enabled.  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.
Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw withpartition wise join enabled.
List pgsql-hackers
(2018/07/04 19:11), Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 4, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Etsuro Fujita
> <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>  wrote:
>>
>> I don't produce a test case where the plan is an Append with Gather
>> subplans, but I'm not sure that it's a good thing to allow us to consider
>> such a plan because in that plan, each Gather would try to grab its own pool
>> of workers.  Am I missing something?
>
> If the overall join can not use parallelism, having individual child
> joins use parallel query might turn out to be efficient even if done
> one child at a time. Parallel append drastically reduces the cases
> where something like could be useful, but I don't think we can
> theoretically eliminate the need for such a plan.

In the case where scanjoin_target_parallel_safe=false, we actually will 
consider such parallel paths using the existing partial paths for the 
parent appendrel in the code path shown in a previous email (note: we 
would already have done generate_partitionwise_join_paths or 
set_append_rel_pathlist for the parent appendrel in query_planner.)  For 
such a parallel path, we might need to do a projection in the Gather 
node for generating the SRF-free scan/join target, but I think that 
would be still efficient.  So, I'm not sure that we really need to 
create child Gathers and generate an Append with those Gathers, as you 
mentioned.

Another thing I noticed is: actually, we don't produce an Append with 
child Gathers in apply_scanjoin_target_to_paths, which I thought we 
would do that in the case of scanjoin_target_parallel_safe=false, but I 
noticed I was wrong.  Sorry for that.  The reason is because in that 
case, even if we create new partial Append paths with child Gathers, we 
don't run generate_gatehr_paths for the newly created partial paths at 
the end of that function shown below, since the parent's 
consider_parallel flag is set to false in that case:

     /*
      * Consider generating Gather or Gather Merge paths.  We must only 
do this
      * if the relation is parallel safe, and we don't do it for child 
rels to
      * avoid creating multiple Gather nodes within the same plan. We 
must do
      * this after all paths have been generated and before 
set_cheapest, since
      * one of the generated paths may turn out to be the cheapest one.
      */
     if (rel->consider_parallel && !IS_OTHER_REL(rel))
         generate_gather_paths(root, rel, false);

Best regards,
Etsuro Fujita


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Gierth
Date:
Subject: Re: Should contrib modules install .h files?
Next
From: Etsuro Fujita
Date:
Subject: Re: Expression errors with "FOR UPDATE" and postgres_fdw with partitionwise join enabled.