Re: help! - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Larry Rosenman
Subject Re: help!
Date
Msg-id 59490000.1069120910@lerlaptop.lerctr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: help!  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers

--On Tuesday, November 18, 2003 09:59:32 +0800 Christopher Kings-Lynne
<chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> wrote:

> Wait for confirmation from at least one other developer perhaps, buy you
> can try this:
>
> 1. Set attisdropped to false for the attribute
>
> 2. Set the atttypid back to whatever the oid of the type of that column
> is/was   (Compare to an undropped similar column)
>
> 3. Use ALTER TABLE/SET NOT NULL on the column if it was originally NOT
> NULL
>
> 4. Set attstattarget to -1 to re-enable stat gathering
>
> 5. Rename the column (attname field) back to whatever it was.
>
> 6. Re set the default on the column
>
> 7. Done. (I think)
>
> By the way, vacuuming doesn't necessarily have much to do with it -
> updating rows does though.  I'm not 100% sure what will happen exactly
> when you follow the steps above (reversing what's in RemoveAttributeById).
I did the following, and was able to do what I needed to do:

update pg_catalog.pg_attribute set
attname='instance1',attisdropped='f',attypid=1048 where attrelid=2356153
and attname='........pg.dropped.6........';

and then re-do the stuff that my rt needed,  and then re-drop the column.

(basically the RT docs blew one character in a field name, and I wasn't
paying attention :-) )

LER

>
> Chris
>
> Larry Rosenman wrote:
>
>> I screwed up, and dropped a column when I shouldn't have.
>>
>> I have *not* vacuumed this DB yet.
>>
>> Is there any catalog mucking I can do to bring it back?
>>
>> LER
>>
>>



--
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Joshua D. Drake"
Date:
Subject: Re: Release cycle length
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Re: Release cycle length