Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer - Mailing list pgadmin-support
From | Darren Duncan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer |
Date | |
Msg-id | 586bcde8-6d29-a7fc-e25f-6afde302d504@darrenduncan.net Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer
Re: Proposal: Drop support for Internet Explorer |
List | pgadmin-support |
You have a typo `elif browser != 'chrom'` but otherwise I see no problems with the patch, thank you. -- Darren Duncan On 2020-04-14 7:46 a.m., Dave Page wrote: > Ooops. Thanks for catching that. Here it is. > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 3:45 PM Neel Patel <neel.patel@enterprisedb.com > <mailto:neel.patel@enterprisedb.com>> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > Looks like patch is missing in attachment. > > Thanks, > Neel Patel > > > On Tue 14 Apr, 2020, 6:53 PM Dave Page, <dpage@pgadmin.org > <mailto:dpage@pgadmin.org>> wrote: > > Here's an updated patch that gives a slightly different message if the > browser is unknown vs. unsupported/deprecated. As with the previous > patch, the check can be disabled in the config. > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 5:07 AM Khushboo Vashi > <khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com > <mailto:khushboo.vashi@enterprisedb.com>> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 11:57 PM Darren Duncan > <darren@darrenduncan.net <mailto:darren@darrenduncan.net>> wrote: > > The patch looks good as much as I understand it, but this raises > an important > question: > > How should one best handle minority browsers that may be > completely modern but > you may not specifically know about them? Such as the newer > crop of browsers > that emphasize stronger privacy or may have fewer identifiers? > > While going on a whitelist as the patch essentially does for > known good browsers > is conservative, I feel that an alteration would be good. > > I propose dividing the browsers/environments into 3 categories, > which are > recognized-supported, recognized-unsupported, and unrecognized. > > > So the unsupported older versions of supported browsers get a > stronger message > encouraging a browser switch as they are recognized as > unsupported, while > unrecognized browsers get a different weaker message saying they > weren't > recognized so we can't determine if they'd work; both can point > to the list of > known supported browsers. > > I do agree with this suggestion. > > Related to this, there could be an application toggle that > affects the > unrecognized category where users can basically say, yes I > understand you don't > recognize this browser, please hide the warning, or something > like that. > > Also, it probably goes without saying, but the code/templates > will need to be > structured in such a way that the warning message uses about > plain as possible > HTML so that if the browser doesn't support displaying the UI in > general it can > at least display the message. > > -- Darren Duncan > > On 2020-04-09 4:36 a.m., Dave Page wrote: > > Hi > > > > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 12:26 AM Darren Duncan wrote: > > > > If its hard to know how many people are actually using > Internet Explorer: > > > > You could make the next release of pgAdmin display a > message occasionally to > > users of Internet Explorer saying that Internet Explorer > will no longer be > > officially supported in a future version, and when that > version comes the > > message says now no longer supported. > > > > You can then see how many people contact you about this > to express concern. > > > > > > Good idea. I've hacked up a patch to warn users if they're > using a deprecated or > > unsupported browser. > > > > CCing Akshay for a review :-) > > > > -- > > Dave Page > > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > > Twitter: @pgsnake > > > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > > > > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company > > > > -- > Dave Page > Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com > Twitter: @pgsnake > > EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
pgadmin-support by date: