On 11/06/2016 23:37, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On 09/06/2016 16:04, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> OK, I pushed this after re-reviewing it and fixing a number of
>> oversights. There remains only the task of adding max_parallel_degree
>> as a system-wide limit (as opposed to max_parallel_degree now
>> max_parallel_workers_per_gather which is a per-Gather limit), which
>> I'm going to argue should be a new open item and not necessarily one
>> that I have to own myself. I would like to take care of it, but I
>> will not put it ahead of fixing actual defects and I will not promise
>> to have it done in time for 9.6.
>>
>
> PFA a patch to fix this open item. I used the GUC name provided in the
> 9.6 open item page (max_parallel_workers), with a default value of 4.
> Value 0 is another way to disable parallel query.
>
Sorry I just realized I made a stupid mistake, I didn't check in all
slots to get the number of active parallel workers. Fixed in attached v2.
--
Julien Rouhaud
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org
