Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Date
Msg-id 5830.1197869761@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> This behavior suggests that they can't even deal with LIMIT/OFFSET
>> values that aren't simple integer literals ...

> I suppose when they added these features I think they didn't have subqueries,
> so there wasn't really much useful that could be done with arbitrary
> expressions here. Being able to do "LIMIT 1+1" doesn't actually add anything.

Sure.  I think our first implementation of LIMIT was similarly
constrained.  It's just amusing that they haven't moved past that,
despite having had the feature first ...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Negative LIMIT and OFFSET?
Next
From: "Gokulakannan Somasundaram"
Date:
Subject: Re: EXPLAIN ANALYZE printing logical and hardware I/O per-node