Re: Extension/Language of plPerl in PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Extension/Language of plPerl in PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 582d2755-bd70-621d-c4b2-514079da1f8d@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE:Extension/Language of plPerl in PostgreSQL  (Karthick Damodar <karthick.damodar@aspiresys.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 05/24/2018 06:31 AM, Karthick Damodar wrote:
> Hi Team,
> 
> I had tried to install “*plperlu”* extension in PostgreSQL 9.5 and 
> PostgreSQL 10. But I am returned with an following error message,
> 
> ERROR: could not load library "C:/Program 
> Files/PostgreSQL/9.5/lib/plperl.dll": The specified module could not be 
> found.
> 
> SQL state: XX000.
> 
> *Note:* I have installed *ActiveState(Perl)* in my local system and 
> environment variables are assigned properly.
> 
> Even I tried in slack community and googled for this issue, but didn’t 
> get a proper solution.
> 
> Please let me know the solution for this as soon as possible.
> 
> FYI, following is the specification of the packages I installed,
> 
> 1.ActivePerl 5.26.1 Build 2601 (64-bit) – Perl
> 
> 2.pgAdmin 4 v3, pgAdmin III 1.20
> 
> 3.PostgreSQL 10 and PostgreSQL 9.5
> 
> 4.OS Windows 7 professional 64 bit operating system

Assuming you are using the EDB install see:

https://www.enterprisedb.com/docs/en/10.0/Language_Pack_v10/EDB_Postgres_Language_Pack_Guide.1.02.html


> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Karthick
> 
> Aspire Systems
> 
> This e-mail message and any attachments are for the sole use of the 
> intended recipient(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential, trade 
> secret or privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, 
> disclosure or distribution is prohibited and may be a violation of law. 
> If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by 
> reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
> 


-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Adrian Klaver
Date:
Subject: Re: Insert data if it is not existing
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Parameter placeholders, $n vs ?