[ redirecting to pgsql-docs ]
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On fre, 2010-09-03 at 13:53 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It would probably be reasonable to put something into chapter 34 of the
>> docs pointing out this limitation. I'm not sure exactly where though.
>> Should we invent a "compatibility issues" section in that chapter,
>> analogous to the ones we have for individual SQL commands? Are there
>> other issues worth documenting for the information_schema views?
> A very similar issue is already documented here:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/infoschema-triggers.html
That sort of annotation was my first thought, but we'd have to repeat
ourselves in multiple places because there are several views that are
affected by the constraint-name issue. (Come to think of it, isn't
triggered_update_columns also affected by the trigger-name issue?)
Is that the direction we want to go, or would it be better to factor
the information out into a separate page about compatibility gotchas?
regards, tom lane
