Re: Question about ranking & full text - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Artur Zakirov
Subject Re: Question about ranking & full text
Date
Msg-id 5710F023.8000501@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Question about ranking & full text  (Nicolas Paris <niparisco@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 15.04.2016 15:47, Nicolas Paris wrote:
> Hi,
> I wonder why the third query returns 0.
> To me, it would return 0.1, because there is not baz in the text
>
> Thanks !
> (pg 9.4)
>
> SELECT ts_rank_cd(apod.t, query,4) AS rank
> FROM (SELECT to_tsvector('foo baz') as t) as apod, to_tsquery('foo &
> baz') query
> WHERE query @@ apod.t;
> rank        |
> ------------|
> 0.100000001 |
>
> SELECT ts_rank_cd(apod.t, query,4) AS rank
> FROM (SELECT to_tsvector('foo ') as t) as apod, to_tsquery('foo & !
> baz') query
> WHERE query @@ apod.t;
>
> rank        |
> ------------|
> 0.100000001 |
>
> SELECT ts_rank_cd(apod.t, query,4) AS rank
> FROM (SELECT to_tsvector('foo ') as t) as apod, to_tsquery(' ! baz') query
> WHERE query @@ apod.t;
>
> rank        |
> ------------|
> 0.0         |
>
>

Hello,

I think this is a right behaviour of the function. Because it computes
how often the query terms appear in the document, how close together the
terms are in the document, and how important is the part of the document
where they occur.

In the third example found terms are empty. And the function can't do
calculates with empty terms. It sees that the terms are empty and
returns 0.0.

--
Artur Zakirov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Nicolas Paris
Date:
Subject: Question about ranking & full text
Next
From: Alexey Bashtanov
Date:
Subject: Re: Deadlock between VACUUM and ALTER TABLE commands