Re: Sequence Access Method WIP - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Petr Jelinek
Subject Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Date
Msg-id 5703DF4E.2030004@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Sequence Access Method WIP  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Sequence Access Method WIP  (Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 04/04/16 15:53, Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr@2ndquadrant.com
> <mailto:petr@2ndquadrant.com>> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hi,
>  >
>  > new version attached that should fix the issue. It was alignment -
> honestly don't know what I was thinking using fixed alignment when the
> AMs can define their own type.
>  >
>
> Yeah... now all works fine... I had a minor issue when apply to the
> current master but the attached fix it and I also added tab-complete
> support for CREATE SEQUENCE...USING and ALTER SEQUENCE...USING.
>

Cool thanks.

> I ran all the regression tests and all passed.
>
> I have just one question about de 0002 patch:
> - There are some reason to not use TransactionId instead of uint32 in
> GaplessSequenceState struct?
>

I missed we have that :)

--   Petr Jelinek                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/  PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATH] Jsonb, insert a new value into an array at arbitrary position
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Move PinBuffer and UnpinBuffer to atomics