Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2017-04-05 00:39:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> but
>> if that's what we're doing, let's make sure we do it consistently.
>> I haven't read the patch, but the comments in this thread make me fear
>> that it's introducing some ad-hoc, inconsistent behavior.
> I'm a bit worried too due to the time constraints here, but I think
> resetting the clock at Execute too actually makes a fair amount sense.
Meh. Two days before feature freeze is not the time to be introducing
a rushed redefinition of the wire protocol --- and let's not fool
ourselves, that is what this amounts to. Let's push this out to v11
and think about it more carefully.
regards, tom lane
