On 2017-04-05 09:46:31 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On 2017-04-05 00:39:51 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> but
> >> if that's what we're doing, let's make sure we do it consistently.
> >> I haven't read the patch, but the comments in this thread make me fear
> >> that it's introducing some ad-hoc, inconsistent behavior.
>
> > I'm a bit worried too due to the time constraints here, but I think
> > resetting the clock at Execute too actually makes a fair amount sense.
>
> Meh. Two days before feature freeze is not the time to be introducing
> a rushed redefinition of the wire protocol --- and let's not fool
> ourselves, that is what this amounts to. Let's push this out to v11
> and think about it more carefully.
What I was trying to say is that I think the change makes sense and
isn't particularly ad-hoc, but that I don't think we need to force this
for v10.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
