Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql
Date
Msg-id CA+Tgmoacgh1qnLpCen=OtH4Mh--1=asakyE6rLy5HgO_w0eYBA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: partitioned tables and contrib/sepgsql  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Apr 5, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Tue, Apr 4, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>>> Any objections?
>
>> I'm guessing Tom's going to have a strong feeling about whether 0001a
>> is the right way to address the stdbool issue,
>
> I will?  [ looks ... ]  Yup, you're right.

It happens occasionally.  :-)

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Statement timeout behavior in extended queries
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Rewriting the test of pg_upgrade as a TAP test