Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andreas Karlsson
Subject Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL
Date
Msg-id 568A9F72.60206@proxel.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL
List pgsql-hackers
On 01/04/2016 07:26 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You may want to use Matches() instead of TailMatches() for performance reasons.

Probably, but if so should we not also change the surrounding rules to 
also use Matches()? I imitated the surrounding code to keep code 
consistency and avoid errors.

I thought I saw some patch from you changing many of the rules from 
TailMatches() to Matches(). Perhaps I should just update my patch after 
your patch has been applied.

Andreas



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Christoph Berg
Date:
Subject: Re: Building pg_xlogdump reproducibly
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Improved tab completion for FDW DDL