On 01/04/2016 07:26 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> You may want to use Matches() instead of TailMatches() for performance reasons.
Probably, but if so should we not also change the surrounding rules to
also use Matches()? I imitated the surrounding code to keep code
consistency and avoid errors.
I thought I saw some patch from you changing many of the rules from
TailMatches() to Matches(). Perhaps I should just update my patch after
your patch has been applied.
Andreas