I notice this 'i' state with bdr 0.9.1 (
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/bdr/issues/145)
But this is not the same problem as far as I understand.
In my case, I notice this problem when constantly updating the database. (I was not able to reproduce it with 0.9.3)
Note that I sometimes saw this 'i' state with two nodes only and 0.9.3 version, but it didn't seem to affect the replication, even if I am not confortable with this ...
Sylvain
Le 08/12/2015 18:36, Selim Tuvi a écrit :
P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Thanks Sylvain, I ran the following on all nodes and dropped the db on all but the first node and rejoined them to the cluster.
Unfortunately the node_status still says "i" for the second and third nodes when I look at bdr.bdr_nodes under the first node.
Under the second node, the node_status has "r" for all and under the third node it has "i" only for the second node.
No warning or error entries in the log file on all nodes but the replication works only from the first node to the second and third nodes and from the second node to the third node.
-Selim
Did you try this :
https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/bdr/issues/127 :
<<<
BEGIN;
SET LOCAL bdr.skip_ddl_locking = on;
SET LOCAL bdr.permit_unsafe_ddl_commands = on;
SET LOCAL bdr.skip_ddl_replication = on;
SECURITY LABEL FOR bdr ON DATABASE mydb IS NULL;
DELETE FROM bdr.bdr_connections;
DELETE FROM bdr.bdr_nodes;
SELECT bdr.bdr_connections_changed();
COMMIT;
SELECT pg_terminate_backend(pid)
FROM pg_stat_activity
WHERE datname = current_database() AND application_name LIKE '%): perdb';
>>>
For now, I never went into situations where I had to destroy all the databases in all nodes.
Sylvain