Re: Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type - Mailing list pgsql-general

From John R Pierce
Subject Re: Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type
Date
Msg-id 56255E11.8000007@hogranch.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type  (romeo407 <hernandez40724@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On 10/19/2015 11:33 AM, romeo407 wrote:
> I am using postgres 9.4 and am new to this but I have 2 columns right now
> latitudes & longitudes. I have them saved as a real column so they take up 4
> bits each 8 altogether. I see that point is used for latitudes and
> longitudes but it is a whopping 16 bits are there any benefits (Performance)
> of using point over real datatype for coordinates? I plan on using indexes
> on the column and do receive a lot of inserts .


32bit REAL values of latitude and longitude are not very precise, maybe
4 arcseconds of latitude and 30 arcseconds of longitude... thats on the
order of up to nearly a km of error.







--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: romeo407
Date:
Subject: Are there any major benefits to using point and not real data type
Next
From: Scott Mead
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] postgresql table data control