On 10/7/15 6:44 AM, Filip Rembiałkowski wrote:
> Oct 2 2015 01:19 "Michael Paquier" <michael.paquier@gmail.com
> <mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Filip Rembiałkowski
> <filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com <mailto:filip.rembialkowski@gmail.com>>
> wrote:
> > > I just want to understand why there is LOCK TABLE not LOCK TABLE ONLY.
> >
> > It seems to me that you'd still want to use LOCK TABLE particularly if
> > the dump is only done on a subset of tables, using --table for
> > example.
>
> Right. But please consider this use case, when I have to dunp only given
> schema, nothing more and nothing less.
>
> Is --schema option not just for that?
>
> Locking child tables seems a bit counter-intuitive.
>
> COPY does not touch child tables, also.
I agree this seems unnecessary.
OTOH, now that the catalog is MVCC capable, do we even still need to
lock the objects for a schema-only dump?
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
