Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 55945422.7090708@commandprompt.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
List pgsql-hackers
On 07/01/2015 01:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> At the very least I think we should start to rely on 'static inline's
>> working. There is not, and hasn't been for a while, any buildfarm animal
>> that does not support it
>
> pademelon doesn't.

Other reasoning aside, pademelon is running an HPUX version that is 10 
years old. I don't think we should care.

JD

-- 
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/  503-667-4564
PostgreSQL Centered full stack support, consulting and development.
Announcing "I'm offended" is basically telling the world you can't
control your own emotions, so everyone else should do it for you.



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Next
From: Oskari Saarenmaa
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6