Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6
Date
Msg-id 12418.1435784946@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes:
> On 07/01/2015 01:33 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>>> At the very least I think we should start to rely on 'static inline's
>>> working. There is not, and hasn't been for a while, any buildfarm animal
>>> that does not support it

>> pademelon doesn't.

> Other reasoning aside, pademelon is running an HPUX version that is 10 
> years old. I don't think we should care.

Try 16.  The reason I run it is not because anyone cares about actually
running Postgres on such a machine; it's just so that we will know when
we are breaking compatibility with ancient C compilers.  I brought it up
merely to refute Andres' claim that we do not have buildfarm coverage
of the case.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: 9.6 commitfest schedule
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6