On 1/10/18 22:24, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:45:56PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> On 1/8/18 23:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Should we just remove it? Apparently, it was never functional to begin
>> with. Otherwise, we'd have to write a second query to return the value
>> to print. wait_for_slot_catchup has the same issue. Seems like a lot
>> of overhead for something that has never been used.
committed
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
