Re: refactor subscription tests to use PostgresNode'swait_for_catchup - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 09:45:56PM -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 1/8/18 23:47, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Should we just remove it?  Apparently, it was never functional to begin
> with.  Otherwise, we'd have to write a second query to return the value
> to print.  wait_for_slot_catchup has the same issue.  Seems like a lot
> of overhead for something that has never been used.

Fine for me to remove it.
--
Michael