On 23/01/15 00:40, Andreas Karlsson wrote:
> - Renamed some things from int12 to int128, there are still some places
> with int16 which I am not sure what to do with.
>
I'd vote for renaming them to int128 too, there is enough C functions
that user int16 for 16bit integer that this is going to be confusing
otherwise.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services