Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Steele
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id 548532b5-0fc8-09f7-6886-68db75242830@pgmasters.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Responses RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> 
> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
>> but it was not necessary.
>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
> 
> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at 
> first.
> Then we can improve the docs if required.

+1

-- 
-David
david@pgmasters.net



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function
Next
From: "osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com"
Date:
Subject: RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data