RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com
Subject RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id OSBPR01MB4888FD66D0AA83944DEFC554ED769@OSBPR01MB4888.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, April 6, 2021 8:44 PM David Steele <david@pgmasters.net> wrote:
> On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> >
> > On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> >> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced, but it was not
> >> necessary.
> >> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
> >
> > So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
> > If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version
> > at first.
> > Then we can improve the docs if required.
>
> +1
Yes, please. What I suggested is almost same as your idea.
Thank you for your confirmation.


Best Regards,
    Takamichi Osumi




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Next
From: vignesh C
Date:
Subject: Re: Replication slot stats misgivings