Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id 988f2f72-d5a8-3ff0-3b12-265f10a9e205@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (David Steele <david@pgmasters.net>)
Responses Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@oss.nttdata.com>)
Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 2021/04/06 20:44, David Steele wrote:
> On 4/6/21 7:13 AM, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
>>> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
>>> but it was not necessary.
>>> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.
>>
>> So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
>> If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version atfirst.
>> Then we can improve the docs if required.
> 
> +1

Thanks! So I pushed the patch.


On 2021/04/06 20:48, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> Yes, please. What I suggested is almost same as your idea.

Thanks!

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bharath Rupireddy
Date:
Subject: Re: Allow batched insert during cross-partition updates
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: New IndexAM API controlling index vacuum strategies