Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Fujii Masao
Subject Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
Date
Msg-id d4dc656f-8eab-ecf2-4ad4-b4d4e1b317e1@oss.nttdata.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data  ("osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com" <osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com>)
Responses Re: Stronger safeguard for archive recovery not to miss data
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 

On 2021/04/06 15:59, osumi.takamichi@fujitsu.com wrote:
> I just wanted to write why the error was introduced,
> but it was not necessary.
> We should remove and fix the first part of the sentence.

So the consensus is almost the same as the latest patch?
If they are not so different, I'm thinking to push the latest version at first.
Then we can improve the docs if required.

Regards,

-- 
Fujii Masao
Advanced Computing Technology Center
Research and Development Headquarters
NTT DATA CORPORATION

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavel Borisov
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Covering SPGiST index
Next
From: Dean Rasheed
Date:
Subject: Re: pgbench - add pseudo-random permutation function