Re: planstate_tree_walker - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: planstate_tree_walker
Date
Msg-id 5459.1442496834@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to planstate_tree_walker  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: planstate_tree_walker  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Here is a patch that *just* introduces planstate_tree_walker and which
> is hopefully correct.  I stole the logic from ExplainPreScanNode,
> which I also refactored to use the new walker instead of duplicating
> the logic.

It seems a little odd to have removed functions from explain.c altogether
but left their header comments behind.  Otherwise this seems sound.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: tsvector work with citext
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: honour TEMP_CONFIG in pg_upgrade tests