On 7/8/14 6:03 AM, Ali Akbar wrote:
> If we put 1 as the parameter, the resulting Node will link to the
> existing children. In this case, the namespace problem for the children
> might be still exists. If any of the children uses different
> namespace(s) than the parent, the namespace definition will not be
> copied correctly.
This analysis might very well be right, but I think we should prove it
with a test case.
