On 10/26/2014 08:53 PM, David G Johnston wrote:
> John R. Sowden wrote
>> I have been a foxpro/dos programmer for my small business for about 35
>> years. I use linux for all but database stuff. For db I use
>> foxpro/dosemu. It looks like pg is my best bet for linux/sql. After
>> reading an o'reilly book on pg (_practical postgresql_), not one word
>> was mentioned in the procedural language chapter about displaying text.
>> I write complete applications (in foxpro), not just queries and forms.
>>
>> What am I missing here? I am not interested in trying to learn C, C++,
>> Java, or Perl in order to read sql databases.
>
> Unlike FoxPro, PostgreSQL does not have any kind of user interface
> development layer built in. PL/pgsql is intended to allow you to process
> data using procedural logic instead of just a sequence of SQL set-based
> statements. There is no way to write an entire user application purely with
> PL/pgsql - the functions you write end up performing specific data
> manipulation tasks that are glued together by the caller using a more full
> featured programming language.
>
> The book you chose to read is 12 YEARS old; you will find much is not
> covered there (or is outright wrong) simply because things have changed
> considerably in that time period.
>
> You will have to choose a language to develop your application in and then
> use an appropriate database driver for that language to connect to your
> PostgreSQL instance. It is quite probable you could even continue using
> Foxpro and simply connect to PostgreSQL via ODBC.
>
> I would suggest you first read large portions of the current documentation -
> you will find that few introductory books on PostgreSQL exist because the
> documentation itself is well written. That is not to say that newer books
> targeting newcomers do not exist...
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Trying-to-learn-the-PL-pgsql-procedural-language-tp5824353p5824361.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - novice mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
Thank you both for your response. This does not sound good. It looks
like I am going to have to find a linux language that I can embed sql
commands to talk to pg.
John
