adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Date
Msg-id 52F3B5E7.6040508@dunslane.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: jsonb and nested hstore  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Re: adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore
Re: adt Makefile, was Re: jsonb and nested hstore
List pgsql-hackers
On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> diff --git a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >index 1ae9fa0..fd93d9b 100644
>> >--- a/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >+++ b/src/backend/utils/adt/Makefile
>> >@@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ OBJS = acl.o arrayfuncs.o array_selfuncs.o array_typanalyze.o \
>> >      tsquery_op.o tsquery_rewrite.o tsquery_util.o tsrank.o \
>> >      tsvector.o tsvector_op.o tsvector_parser.o \
>> >      txid.o uuid.o windowfuncs.o xml.o rangetypes_spgist.o \
>> >-    rangetypes_typanalyze.o rangetypes_selfuncs.o
>> >+    rangetypes_typanalyze.o rangetypes_selfuncs.o \
>> >+    jsonb.o jsonb_support.o
> Odd, most OBJS lines are kept in alphabetical order, but that doesn't
> seem to be the case here.


This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types 
files following each other.

Worth cleaning up?

I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of 
object files and then combining them into $OBJS.

Or it could just be left more or less as is - it's hardly a breakthrough 
advance.

cheers

andrew




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: extension_control_path
Next
From: PostgreSQL - Hans-Jürgen Schönig
Date:
Subject: Re: Small GIN optimizations (after 9.4)