Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> On 02/01/2014 05:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Odd, most OBJS lines are kept in alphabetical order, but that doesn't
>> seem to be the case here.
> This whole list is a mess, and we don't even have all the range_types
> files following each other.
> Worth cleaning up?
+1. It's just neatnik-ism, but isn't compulsive neatnik-ism pretty
much a job requirement for programmers? It's hard enough dealing
with necessary complexities without having to wonder if some seemingly
arbitrary choice has hidden meanings.
> I'm actually wondering if it might be worth having some subgroups of
> object files and then combining them into $OBJS.
Nah, let's just alphabetize them and be done. The Makefile has no
reason to care about subgroups of those files.
regards, tom lane
