Re: unixware and --with-ldap - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Albe Laurenz
Subject Re: unixware and --with-ldap
Date
Msg-id 52EF20B2E3209443BC37736D00C3C1380BF08119@EXADV1.host.magwien.gv.at
Whole thread Raw
In response to unixware and --with-ldap  (ohp@pyrenet.fr)
Responses Re: unixware and --with-ldap
List pgsql-hackers
>>> I have tried --with-thread-safety and configure fails on ldap check
>>> because for some reason CTHREAD_FLAGS (-Kpthread for UW) is missing
>>> on compile command, although present before that. I can't find why
>>
>> You mean PTHREAD_FLAGS, right?
>>
> Nope,I mean PTHREAD_CFLAGS witch is defined in src/templates/unixware

PTHREAD_CFLAGS, of course :^)

Oops, this seems to be an oversight in (my) original code.

I'd say we should change the lines
 AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],     [AC_MSG_ERROR([library 'ldap_r' is required for LDAP])],
[$PTHREAD_LIBS$EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS]) 

to
 AC_CHECK_LIB(ldap_r, ldap_simple_bind, [],     [AC_MSG_ERROR([library 'ldap_r' is required for LDAP])],
[$PTHREAD_CFLAGS$PTHREAD_LIBS $EXTRA_LDAP_LIBS]) 

I know that this is abuse of AC_CHECK_LIB, but it is only a test
and LIBS is discarded later.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_restore fails with a custom backup file
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_am.amstrategies should be 0 when not meaningful?