Re: CLUSTER FREEZE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: CLUSTER FREEZE
Date
Msg-id 526AA840.4000205@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to CLUSTER FREEZE  (Thomas Munro <munro@ip9.org>)
Responses Re: CLUSTER FREEZE  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 10/24/2013 07:19 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> In any case, it's very far from obvious to me that CLUSTER ought
> to throw away information by default, which is what you're proposing.

The problem here is that you're thinking of the 1/10 of 1% of our users
who have a serious PostgreSQL failure and post something on the lists
for help, for which XID forensic information is useful.  As opposed to
the 99.9% of our users for whom deferred freezing is a performance
burden.  While I realize that the 0.1% of users are more likely to have
contact with you, personally, it's still bad policy for the project.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Detection of nested function calls
Next
From: fabriziomello
Date:
Subject: Re: psql should show disabled internal triggers