Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Greg Sabino Mullane
Subject Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
Date
Msg-id 525891f1b7d55fd475a1f709104931ca@biglumber.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible  ("Magnus Hagander" <mha@sollentuna.net>)
Responses Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
List pgsql-patches
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Four years later, people were saying:

>> OK, this new patch prints a warning on any major version
>> mismatch, newer or older.
>
> I would suggest showing both the client and server versions that
> mismatched. If you're in a scenario with several versions on the same
> machine of both client and server (hosting scenario, I'd imagine), that
> would certainly help.

This all seems so familiar somehow... :)

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2001-11/msg00184.php

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200508312042
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFDFk8HvJuQZxSWSsgRAunEAKDsF6M1QuDkK2JQnH2gH2iHnahbNACdGKTu
inh9CWsDd27O4F1xT931mTs=
=EoUH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
Next
From: Atsushi Ogawa
Date:
Subject: sum(int4)/sum(int2) improvement