Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible
Date
Msg-id 200509020106.j8216IM15507@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] PSQL commands not backwards-compatible  ("Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg@turnstep.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
[ There is text before PGP section. ]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Four years later, people were saying:
>
> >> OK, this new patch prints a warning on any major version
> >> mismatch, newer or older.
> >
> > I would suggest showing both the client and server versions that
> > mismatched. If you're in a scenario with several versions on the same
> > machine of both client and server (hosting scenario, I'd imagine), that
> > would certainly help.
>
> This all seems so familiar somehow... :)
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2001-11/msg00184.php

Yep.  I think the reason it is acceptable now is that the server version
is supplied automatically via the protocol, so we don't need to issue a
query on every psql startup to check it.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Stephan Szabo
Date:
Subject: Re: Work-in-progress referential action trigger timing
Next
From: Koichi Suzuki
Date:
Subject: Re: A couple of patches for PostgreSQL 64bit support