Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE
Date
Msg-id 5217BFD0.7030304@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>)
Responses Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>)
Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/23/2013 11:30 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> 2013/8/23 Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>
> 
>> Pavel,
>>
>>> But it can have a different reason. In T-SQL (Microsoft or Sybase) or
>> MySQL
>>> a unbound query is used to direct transfer data to client side.
>>
>> Are you planning to implement that in PL/pgSQL?
>>
>>
> yes. I would to see a stored procedures with this functionality in pg

Is there some reason we wouldn't use RETURN QUERY in that case, instead
of SELECT?  As I said above, it would be more consistent with existing
PL/pgSQL.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fabien COELHO
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pg_sleep(interval)
Next
From: Marko Tiikkaja
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE