All,
Vik's feature would be useful for detecting an accidental split in a
replication cluster. That is, it would be another tool for detecting if
you've made a mistake and created two masters. So +1 from me.
It will also be useful for me for sharding. Right now, I'm doing a
hackish version of Vik's function, so I'd be glad to have it in core.
However, given that the value is the same for all servers in a
replication set, are we sure we want to call it system_identifier? Is
there a better name?
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
