On 2013-08-22 08:45:38 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
> All,
>
> Vik's feature would be useful for detecting an accidental split in a
> replication cluster. That is, it would be another tool for detecting if
> you've made a mistake and created two masters. So +1 from me.
>
> It will also be useful for me for sharding. Right now, I'm doing a
> hackish version of Vik's function, so I'd be glad to have it in core.
>
> However, given that the value is the same for all servers in a
> replication set, are we sure we want to call it system_identifier? Is
> there a better name?
Given it's been named that and visible via pg_controldata for years I am
against introducing confusion by renaming it.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
-- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
