Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Josh Berkus
Subject Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs
Date
Msg-id 52125E08.4020107@agliodbs.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs  (Andrew Gierth <andrew@tao11.riddles.org.uk>)
Responses Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs  (Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb@cybertec.at>)
Re: UNNEST with multiple args, and TABLE with multiple funcs  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08/19/2013 09:23 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> 
> Indeed, it's a big nail in the coffin for SRFs-in-targetlist. Having
> WITH ORDINALITY and this feature, I would vote for removing
> SRF-in-targetlist and call the release PostgreSQL 10.0.

That's not realistic.   We'd have to deprecate that syntax and
repeatedly and loudly warn people about it for at least 3 years after
the release of 9.3.   You're talking about asking people to refactor
hundreds or thousands of lines of code which makes current use of things
like regex_match() in the target list.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jeff Janes
Date:
Subject: Re: pgstat_reset_remove_files ignores its argument
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: danger of stats_temp_directory = /dev/shm