On 06/29/2013 09:24 AM, bhanu udaya wrote:
> Upper and Lower functions are not right choice when the table is > 2.5
> million and where we also have heavy insert transactions.
Prove it. Seriously, just run a test case against it. See how it works
for you. Inserts are generally a very inexpensive operation with Postgres.
>
> I doubt, if we can cache the table if there are frequent
> inserts/updates. The good idea would be to get the DB to case
> insenstive configuration like SQL Server. I would go for this solution,
> if postgres supports.
Postgres does not.
And as Jon said, maybe Postgres isn't the right solution for you. That
would be a bummer but we can't be all things to all people.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ 509-416-6579
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC, @cmdpromptinc
For my dreams of your image that blossoms
a rose in the deeps of my heart. - W.B. Yeats
