Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> I don't really care for using that name for it ---
> iso8601
> Keep in mind that SQL itself is also a kind of ISO, so being more specific
> is useful.
Yes, but by the same token "iso8601" isn't specific enough either.
Several of the other input formats we support have at least as good a
claim on that name.
regards, tom lane
