On 02/16/2013 07:50 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2013, at 12:47 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
>
>> To answer David's point, there is no point in having both
>>
>> get(json,text)
>> get(json, variadic text[])
>>
>> since the second can encompass the first, and having both would make calls ambiguous.
> Oh. Well then how about
>
> get(json, int)
> get(json, text)
> get(json, text[])
>
> ?
>
No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to
accept that we can't make one function name cover all of this.
cheers
andrew
