On Feb 17, 2013, at 6:33 AM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> wrote:
> No, then we don't have a variadic version. You are going to have to accept that we can't make one function name cover
allof this.
Well, for me, I would rather specify an array than call a function with a different name. But it’s six of one,
half-dozenof another, really, as long as it all works.
D
